04 — Risk Measures

Correlation Risk#

DependenceStatistical1 min read
◆ The PatternCorrelations shift in crises — diversification can vanish when you need it most

In calm markets, asset correlations are moderate and diversification works. During stress, correlations spike toward 1 — a phenomenon called correlation breakdown.

σ²p = w′ Σ w
Copula models separate marginal distributions from the dependence structure, allowing non-linear tail dependence to be modeled explicitly. Regime-switching models capture correlation shifts.
// Interactive — stress level and correlation regime shift
Stress level
2008 lesson. Structured-credit losses soared because default correlations jumped far beyond historical norms.
Pattern bridge: Correlation and covariance matrices are explored in The Toolkit — Feature Correlation.
Worked example

Two assets, each 20% volatile, held 50/50. At a correlation of 0.2 the portfolio’s volatility is 15.5%. If the correlation rises to 0.9 in a crisis it is 19.5% — almost the volatility of either asset alone. The diversification you counted on in calm markets is mostly gone exactly when losses come.

Where it misleads
  • Correlations measured in high-volatility periods are biased upwards even if the underlying link has not changed (Forbes & Rigobon 2002); some of the “breakdown” is a measurement effect.
  • The rise is real in the tails, though: equity markets are more correlated in big down-moves than in big up-moves (Longin & Solnik 2001; Ang & Chen 2002).
  • One number cannot describe dependence in the tails; that is what copulas and stress scenarios are for.
In code
vol = np.array([0.20, 0.20])                               # two assets, 20% volatility each
w = np.array([0.5, 0.5])

def port_vol(rho):
    cov = np.outer(vol, vol) * np.array([[1, rho], [rho, 1]])
    return np.sqrt(w @ cov @ w)

calm, stress = port_vol(0.2), port_vol(0.9)
Python, in your browser — edit the code and run it again

Assumes import numpy as np and import pandas as pd. Each snippet carries its own example numbers; the comments say which are made up or simulated.

Sources
  • K. J. Forbes & R. Rigobon, “No Contagion, Only Interdependence: Measuring Stock Market Comovements”, Journal of Finance 57(5), 2002
  • F. Longin & B. Solnik, “Extreme Correlation of International Equity Markets”, Journal of Finance 56(2), 2001
  • A. Ang & J. Chen, “Asymmetric Correlations of Equity Portfolios”, Journal of Financial Economics 63(3), 2002

Last reviewed October 2026 · How this site checks its content · Report a mistake

Linked from 4
← Previous
Volatility Modeling
Open in the full reader, with the topic sidebar