About this site
Pattern is Everything explains the same few patterns as they turn up in statistics, machine learning, time series, markets and everyday life — 257 interactive topics, 17 essays, decision guides and case studies on real data. It is free, with no ads and no paywalls, and open source: static pages, no tracking cookies. This page says how each topic is built, what the labels mean and how the content is checked.
Every number comes from code you can see
Each topic in the ten collections has the same parts:
The essays are shorter and have no code; each has its own references. The guides work the other way round: they start from a task — choosing a test, a metric or a forecasting model — and lead to the topics.
Evidence labels
Every topic carries a label saying how firm the ground under it is.
| Mathematical | A definition or a theorem. The formula is exact; whether it is useful still depends on your data and assumptions. |
| Statistical | Grounded in estimation, validation or empirical evaluation. Comes with uncertainty and assumptions. |
| Practice | An established tool, workflow or engineering pattern — RAG, feature stores, CI/CD. It encodes experience and trade-offs, not a proof or a measured effect. |
| Heuristic | A rule of thumb or a pattern people look for. Useful for thinking and exploring; not proof of a predictive edge. |
| Debated | The evidence is mixed or contested. Test it on your own data before relying on it. |
The label belongs to the topic, not to its collection: in LLM Engineering, attention is Mathematical, scaling laws are Statistical, RAG is Practice and prompt engineering is Heuristic. Chart patterns are Heuristic. In Market Psychology, biases measured in experiments and in investors’ own trades — anchoring, loss aversion, the disposition effect — are Statistical, while market narratives such as the sentiment cycle and Wyckoff’s phases are Heuristic. Technical indicators used as trading signals, stop-losses, herding and transformer forecasters are Debated. The site presents them as hypotheses, together with the research on whether they work.
How the content is checked
In October 2026 the whole site went through a fact-check: every figure and empirical claim in the original text was traced to a source, recomputed, or removed.
Examples of what was fixed: a capital rule attributed to Basel III that was in fact the 1996 amendment; a comparison between two language models stated backwards; the square-root law of random walks inverted; trading-indicator “win rates” with no source behind them. Superlatives such as “the most reliable pattern” were toned down, and assumptions — usually normality — were made explicit where a number depends on them.
Each topic shows when it was last reviewed, and the date is the topic’s own: reviewing one topic does not re-date the rest. A topic falls due for another review six months after its last one in LLM Engineering and MLOps, and eighteen months after it everywhere else — sooner if something it relies on changes. A weekly job lists the topics that are due.
What changes fast
LLM Engineering and MLOps mention specific models, tools and hardware. Those details age within months, so the text dates them (“by 2024…”) rather than calling anything the latest, and these two collections are reviewed more often than the rest. The mathematics underneath changes slowly.
Not financial advice
The market collections teach how traders and researchers think about prices, risk and behaviour. Nothing here is a recommendation to buy or sell anything. Patterns that look convincing in hindsight are exactly what the site warns about — test any rule out of sample, after costs, before trusting it.
Found a mistake?
Please say so. Every topic, essay, guide and case ends with a Report a mistake link: it opens a short form on GitHub with the page already filled in. Say what is wrong and, ideally, give a source. Corrections are made in the open — past reports and what came of them are public, and the change history is in the repository.
Links to sources are checked every month, so a paper that has moved is found before a reader finds it.
Privacy
The site counts page views and a few clicks (which connections and trails people follow, and answers to “Check yourself” questions) with GoatCounter: no cookies, nothing personal, and nothing tied to you. Reading progress is stored only in your own browser.
Support the project
The site costs nothing to run, so any donation goes on in full to mental health organisations; each transfer is listed in the donation log. Sharing a link, or starring the GitHub repository, helps just as much.
Last reviewed: 2 October 2026